163 results for 'filedAt:"2023-10-31"'.
J. Dale denies a company's motion to set aside default in a contract dispute. The company's attorney filed a motion to withdraw and the company did not obtain new representation within the 21-day period. The company's "repeated failures to obtain new counsel in compliance with the Court’s orders amounts to a willful and bad faith failure to respond."
Court: USDC Idaho, Judge: Dale, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 1:22cv323, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Contract
J. Gordon grants the debt collector’s motion to dismiss this suit alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The debtor claims that the collector’s undated letter, which caused her to question its legitimacy, violated debt validation notice requirements, was harassing, misleading and unconscionable. The collector is protected by a Consumer Financial Protection Board regulatory safe harbor because it used a board model letter. The debtor has not alleged that information in the letter was inaccurate and has not plausibly alleged any violations of the Act.
Court: USDC Nevada, Judge: Gordon, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 2:22cv2150, NOS: Consumer Credit - Other Suits, Categories: Debt Collection, Consumer Law
J. Mills grants the compliance company's motion to transfer the bank's complaint to the Central District of California, where the company is pursuing a trade secrets complaint against the bank. The company filed its complaint in California first and it is "apparent that the California lawsuit and this case are, in many respects, two sides of the same coin."
Court: USDC Northern District of Mississippi , Judge: Mills, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 1:23cv139, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Trade Secrets, Jurisdiction, Contract
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Guidry grants a motion by FedEx to apply Texas law in determining the amount the driver can recover for any past medical expenses he may be awarded if successful in his action alleging that he was seriously injured when his vehicle was rear-ended by a FedEx delivery truck. The driver is a Texas resident and drives a vehicle registered in Texas. Although he was injured while passing through Louisiana, all but one of the medical providers with whom he sought care are also located in Texas. Therefore, Texas has the greater interest in the application of its laws to the question of the driver's recoverable past medical expenses.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Louisiana , Judge: Guidry, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 2:22cv3194, NOS: Motor Vehicle - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Tort, Vehicle, Choice Of Law
Per curiam, the appellate court denies defendant’s petition for a writ of mandamus to challenge court’s failure to rule on his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, as well as his counsel’s failure to argue for the suppression of certain evidence. Defendant has not included a record in support of his challenge or shown that his motion has been called to the trial court’s attention. He has also failed to make remedial filings supporting that the motion was made. The petition is denied in part and dismissed in part for want of jurisdiction.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 12-23-00160-CR, Categories: Evidence, Plea, Due Process
J. Elrod finds the trial court properly found in favor of the oil and gas production company in this suit alleging that its former operations supervisor breached his fiduciary duty by awarding contracts to companies owned by his friend. The contractors deliberately delayed operations, resulting in nearly $12 million in overbilling damages and $775,549 in recoupment for value received by the former supervisor. The expert properly calculated damages, and testimony regarding the friend’s companies’ better rates was given from memory. The former supervisor’s credibility was in question due to inconsistent answers given on previous questions, so the jury had discretion to reject the testimony. The court’s decision to deny post-trial discovery is vacated. Affirmed in part. Vacated and remanded in part.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Elrod, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 22-10918, Categories: Employment, Fiduciary Duty, Contract
Per curiam, the circuit finds that the district court properly imposed sanctions in upholding a settlement concerning attorney fees since the order of settlement specified the fee amount, and the argument that attorney incompetence invalidated the agreement constituted a collateral attack on the judgment. In light of other frivolous actions on the record, future appeals or filings relating to the case cannot be brought without obtaining leave of the court. Affirmed.
Court: 2nd Circuit, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 21-2961-cv, Categories: Sanctions, Settlements, Attorney Fees
J. Fletcher finds that the district court properly entered judgment after a bench trial in an admiralty action brought by a towboat company against a company that hired it to tow a drydock, which was damaged in a storm, from Seattle to Ensenada. The tug towed the drydock into the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, where it capsized and sank. The district court correctly granted partial summary judgment to the hiring company on the ground that the towboat was negligent as a matter of law in allowing the drydock to sink in the Sanctuary. However, the Ninth Circuit vacates the district court’s award of prejudgment interest on the $40,000 award against the towboat company. Interest should run from the date of the hiring company's expenditures, rather than the date the drydock sank. Affirmed in part.
Court: 9th Circuit, Judge: 22-35195, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 22-35195, Categories: Admiralty, Property, Negligence
J. Quinn finds that the lower court properly granted summary judgment to the appellee drywall company in this suit brought by an installer who was struck by falling drywall. Nobody from the drywall company directed that the sheets of drywall be placed against a temporary railing, which allegedly gave way and allowed the drywall to fall. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Quinn, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 07-23-00057-CV, Categories: Negligence, Premises Liability
J. Gillmor defers ruling on the United States’ Daubert motion to bar testimony in a wrongful death lawsuit brought by the family of a man who was killed in a helicopter crash allegedly caused by the air traffic controllers. The government’s expert is permitted to testify at trial, allowing the court to determine the reliability and admissibility after the evidence and testimony is presented. The family’s motion to compel production of certain software are inadequately pleaded.
Court: USDC Hawaii, Judge: Gillmor, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 1:20cv266, NOS: Airplane - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Experts, Wrongful Death, Aviation
J. Chaney finds the lower court properly dismissed a personal injury suit. Because the driver of a vehicle that collided with complainant’s vehicle died before the complainant filed her action, the lower court determined the decedent was not a proper party to the suit. A representative for the decedent filed a plea-in-bar, and the lower court granted it, as the time for the complainant to amend to substitute a personal representative for the decedent and for filing a personal injury action had expired. Affirmed.
Court: Virginia Court Of Appeals, Judge: Chaney, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 0104-22-3, Categories: Civil Procedure, Negligence
J. Rectenwald finds that the circuit court properly declined to dismiss Honolulu’s lawsuit against a number of oil and gas producers. Honolulu and its water supply board’s complaint are well pleaded and challenge the sale of fossil-fuel products and the “sophisticated disinformation campaign” behind those sales. The oil companies’ ads were deceptive regarding their promotion of fossil fuel use. Affirmed.
Court: Hawai'i Supreme Court, Judge: Rectenwald, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: SCAP-22-429, Categories: Energy, Tort, Jurisdiction
J. Farris finds the lower court improperly denied a city’s motion to dismiss an employee’s claims of race discrimination and hostile work environment, but properly denied dismissal for her retaliation claim. An employee filed suit claiming she was discriminated against at work based on her race and was subjected to a hostile work environment, but the evidence is insufficient to support her claims. The lower court properly dismissed the City’s motion regarding the employee's retaliation claim as the City failed to state why it should be dismissed. Affirmed in part.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Farris, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 01-22-00676-CV, Categories: Government, Employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation
J. Chehardy finds that a jury properly awarded $187,000 in damages to a plaintiff driver for injuries sustained in a car collision. There was testimony from the driver's neurologist that the injuries from prior accidents were likely soft-tissue injuries that reasonably dissipated and resolved within six months. Further, the neurologist testified that the driver will continue to experience pain and suffering in the future that is caused by the accident. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Chehardy, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 23-CA-89, Categories: Evidence, Jury, Damages
J. Farris finds the lower court improperly found a company had the right to take possession of an apartment from a tenant. The tenant had an apartment lease with PAC Vineyards, and PAC Vineyards filed for eviction based on alleged lease violations and harassment of other tenants. The company later amended the petition for eviction holding itself as PAC Vineyards’ successor-in-interest. While the company has standing to sue, evidence is insufficient to establish that the company had superior right to immediate possession of the apartment, as the lease was between the tenant and PAC Vineyards, and the company failed to prove it owned the apartment or had a lease with the tenant. The instant court awards possession of the apartment to the tenant. Reversed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Farris, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 01-22-00520-CV, Categories: Landlord Tenant, Real Estate, Contract
J. Emfinger finds the lower court properly convicted defendant of capital murder, aggravated assault, possession of a firearm by a felon, and two counts of armed robbery for his role in shooting two men in a nightclub he robbed; one man was killed and the other severely injured. The lower court improperly convicted him on one count of armed robbery because there was no evidence presented that personal property was taken from the victim that was killed. Reversed in part.
Court: Mississippi Court Of Appeals, Judge: Emfinger, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 2021-KA-01161-COA, Categories: Murder, Robbery, Assault
J. Christel grants the professor's motion for contempt and sanctions against the research company and others for not paying court-ordered fees and costs, which arises from the professor's complaint that the research company and others used and sublicensed the professor's intellectual property after he terminated their licensing agreement. The research company must pay a $1,500 sanctions fee, because it does not properly appeal against the $33,500 award the professor won.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Christel, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 2:21cv1301, NOS: Copyrights - Property Rights, Categories: Copyright, Sanctions
J. Windhorst dismisses defendant's appeal of his guilty pleas to reckless operation of a vehicle, drug and paraphernalia possession, and possession of an open alcoholic beverage in a vehicle. In this case, defendant's appeal of his misdemeanor guilty pleas is untimely, and he did not brief any assignments of error regarding the misdemeanor charges.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Windhorst, Filed On: October 31, 2023, Case #: 23-KA-79, Categories: Sentencing, Plea